HomeWhat Is Strategic Restructuring?Research & ResourcesCase StudiesTips & AnswersAdditional ReferencesConsulting ServicesStrategic Solutions Project

Strategic Restructuring:
Partnership Options for Nonprofits

La Piana Associates
  Contact Us  |  Site Index

The Forms of Strategic Restructuring

Deciding to Restructure

Funding the Strategic Restructuring Process

The Negotiations Process

Due Diligence

Financial Issues

External Communications

Implementing a Partnership

Integrating the New Organization

Leadership and Management

Human Resources

Working with Consultants

 

 

 

Tips and Answers to Your Questions
Deciding to Restructure

   

What are the disadvantages of mergers?

In order to understand some of the potential disadvantages of mergers, it may be helpful to look first at what typically motivates a nonprofit to consider such an option, and the potential benefits of doing so.

Based on our experience, nonprofits consider mergers for reasons that fall generally into the following three categories:

  • To improve finances
  • To gain access to a larger skill set
  • To enhance the organization's pursuit of mission

The specific and real benefits of merger that support the above factors include:

  • Improved ability to deliver services
  • The creation of a continuum of services under unified control
  • Better market positioning
  • A larger market share
  • A higher public profile
  • Increased political influence
  • More strategic fundraising
  • A larger staff, allowing greater specialization of functions and the provision of more service
  • Improved economies of scale

The potential disadvantages of pursuing a merger may stem from pursuing it for the wrong reasons - motivations that fall outside of the above categories. For example, a merger that is driven primarily by a funder and without true organizational commitment is less likely to succeed and reap the desired benefits. Similarly, a merger that hinges on the desires of only a few people in the organization(s), without a clear assessment of the motivations and potential benefits, is also unlikely to be successful.

Mergers that happen without the identification of specific desired outcomes and strategies to achieve them are more likely to fail and not reach their potential. In the meantime, much time and money will have been spent on the process. In such cases, it may have been more advantageous to remain as separate entities.

Mergers in which there is not enough attention paid to the integration of the cultures of the merging organizations can also present serious difficulties. This can result in the development of resistance, and even sabotage, within the merging organizations. Not only can such challenges impede the ability of the merged organization to achieve its mission, they can, in extreme circumstances, tarnish the reputation of the organization in the community. Successful mergers are dependent on well-planned and well-executed cultural integration.

It is up to the board and staff leadership of the merging entities to assess the motivations behind and potential benefits of the merger, identify desired outcomes and strategies, make informed decisions to move forward, and then work diligently to make the merger a successful reality.